Home / Testimony / Transcript of Proceedings

SWORN TESTIMONY

Everything said under oath, on the record, in open court, by people who really should have had better things to do. The cat was present. The cat said "meow." The cat was, as ever, just a cat.

THE PEOPLE (who won't shut up) v. TIAGO
In the Department of Definitely Not, Bench Division
Transcript of Proceedings · Case No. NAF-∞ · Volume 1 of 1
Stenographer present Defendant: NOT A FURRY Charge: Owning a green cat Plea: aggressively not guilty
ACT I
Scene 1 · The Charges Are Read, Sort Of

[The court is called to order. A cat sits on the defendant's lap. The cat does not rise. The cat will never rise.]

BAILIFF
All rise. Court is now in session. Except the cat. The cat does what it wants.
THE COURT
Be seated. We are here in the matter of THE PEOPLE, who frankly will not shut up, versus the defendant Tiago. Counsel, state the charge.
PROSECUTION
Your Honor, the People allege, with confidence, that the defendant is a furry.
DEFENSE
He is not.
PROSECUTION
He is, though.
DEFENSE
He is NOT, though.
THE COURT
Gentlemen. We are eleven seconds in. Counsel for the People, present your evidence. The actual evidence.
PROSECUTION
Gladly, Your Honor. The defendant's profile picture is a cat.
THE COURT
...And?
PROSECUTION
And it is a green cat. With round glasses.
THE COURT
And?
PROSECUTION
And... that's the case, Your Honor. That is the entire case.
DEFENSE
OBJECTION  A DRAWING OF AN ANIMAL IS NOT A CONFESSION, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT
Sustained. Mr. Prosecutor, half of recorded history is drawings of animals. We do not arrest the Lascaux caves.
PROSECUTION
Noted, Your Honor. But the caves did not have round glasses.
DEFENSE
Neither does my client. The glasses are on the CAT. We have established the cat is a separate organism.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  THE CAT WEARS GLASSES, IMPLYING SOPHISTICATION, IMPLYING PERSONHOOD, IMPLYING FURRINESS.
THE COURT
Overruled. A cat in glasses is a cat that can see. That is not a crime. That is healthcare.
ACT II
Scene 1 · The Defense Dismantles The Pfp Theory, One Pixel At A Time

[The defense approaches the bench with a single printout. It is the profile picture. It is, as advertised, a cat.]

DEFENSE
Your Honor, I direct the court to People's Exhibit A: the profile picture. I ask the People to describe what they see.
PROSECUTION
A cat.
DEFENSE
A cat. Not a fox. Not a wolf. Not a "protogen," whatever that is. A cat.
PROSECUTION
...A stylized cat.
DEFENSE
"Stylized" is how art works. By the People's standard, the Cheshire Cat is a felon and the Pixar lamp is a known offender.
THE COURT
I will allow the lamp comparison. Continue.
DEFENSE
Does the cat walk on two legs?
PROSECUTION
No.
DEFENSE
Does the cat wear a hoodie? A collar with a bell of self-expression? Does it have, and I quote the indictment, "a sona"?
PROSECUTION
No. It's just... a round cat. With glasses. And it's green.
DEFENSE
Green is a color, Your Honor. The last I checked, the People have not charged the entire Pantone catalogue.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  GREEN IS A SUSPICIOUS COLOR FOR A MAMMAL.
DEFENSE
So is Shrek, and nobody's reading HIM his rights.
THE COURT
Overruled. And sidebar: I am begging the People to introduce a single document that is not a vibe.
PROSECUTION
The defendant... once said the cat was "cute," Your Honor.
DEFENSE
OBJECTION  CALLING A CAT CUTE IS THE BARE MINIMUM OF BEING ALIVE.
THE COURT
Sustained. Loudly sustained. I have called a sandwich cute. I am not on trial.
ACT II
Scene 2 · The People Reach
PROSECUTION
New evidence, Your Honor. The defendant owns a cat in real life. An actual one.
DEFENSE
Yes. That is called "having a pet." It is the single most normal thing a human can do.
PROSECUTION
But he LIKES the cat.
DEFENSE
That is the agreed-upon arrangement with cats, yes.
PROSECUTION
He talks to it.
DEFENSE
Everyone talks to their cat. The cat does not respond. That is the whole tragedy of it.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  TALKING TO ANIMALS IS DOCTOR DOLITTLE BEHAVIOR AND DOCTOR DOLITTLE WAS PROBABLY A FURRY.
THE COURT
Overruled, and the People are now litigating a fictional Victorian veterinarian. I am writing that down so I can be sad about it later.
PROSECUTION
Then consider this, Your Honor. The defendant has, on multiple occasions, said the words "good boy" out loud.
DEFENSE
To the cat.
PROSECUTION
The cat is a girl.
DEFENSE
Then it was, at worst, a clerical error, and the cat did not file a complaint.
THE COURT
Does the cat wish to file a complaint?
THE CAT
meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness declines, Your Honor, stating only that "good boy" is acceptable provided it is followed by food.
THE COURT
The court finds that reasonable. Move on.
ACT III
Scene 1 · The People Call An Expert Witness In Furriness

[A man in a lanyard approaches the stand. He carries a clipboard, a laser pointer, and the air of someone who has been waiting his whole life to be asked exactly one question.]

BAILIFF
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and to keep the laser pointer holstered for the duration of these proceedings?
THE WITNESS
I do. On both counts. Mostly the second.
PROSECUTION
State your name and credentials for the record.
THE WITNESS
Reginald Plume, Your Honor. I hold a self-issued doctorate in Applied Furriness Studies, a field I founded last Tuesday. I have identified over four thousand furries on sight. My accuracy is, by my own count, very high.
PROSECUTION
Doctor Plume, in your expert opinion, what is the single most reliable indicator that a person is a furry?
THE WITNESS
A fursona. An anthropomorphic animal character, walking upright, possessed of clothing, opinions, and a name. That is the gold standard.
PROSECUTION
And the defendant's profile picture. Is it a fursona?
THE WITNESS
...No.
PROSECUTION
I'm sorry?
THE WITNESS
It's a cat. It's just a cat. It walks on four legs, it wears no clothing, and it has the legal opinions of a houseplant. In my professional judgment, that is a cat.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  HOSTILE WITNESS, YOUR HONOR, AND ALSO MY OWN WITNESS, WHICH I CONCEDE IS UNUSUAL.
THE COURT
Overruled. You called the expert. The expert is being expert. This is generally the risk.
DEFENSE
Doctor Plume, to be thorough: of the four thousand furries you have identified, how many were, in fact, just a normal cat?
THE WITNESS
Zero. A cat has never once been a furry. That is the entire distinction. It is, frankly, the whole point of the word.
DEFENSE
And so the People's own paid expert concludes that the People's own central exhibit is a cat.
THE WITNESS
Correct. A green one. With glasses. But mechanically, taxonomically, and spiritually: a cat.
THE COURT
The court would like to note for the record that the prosecution's expert has just delivered the defense's closing argument. The court is enjoying this.
ACT III
Scene 2 · The Prosecution Presents The Color Green As Evidence

[The prosecution wheels in an easel. On it is a single, large swatch of green. The prosecution gestures at it as though it will testify.]

PROSECUTION
Your Honor, the People rest a great deal of weight on this. Behold. Green.
THE COURT
...Yes. That is green. I can see that it is green. What of it?
PROSECUTION
No naturally occurring cat is green, Your Honor. Therefore the cat is invented. Therefore it is a sona. Therefore: furry.
DEFENSE
It is a cartoon, Your Honor. No naturally occurring sponge is also a fry cook, and yet SpongeBob walks free.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  SPONGEBOB IS NOT ON TRIAL.
DEFENSE
Neither, increasingly, is my client. We are looking at a square of paint.
THE COURT
Counsel for the People, is the color itself the defendant? Are we trying the color green?
PROSECUTION
...No, Your Honor.
THE COURT
Then the green may step down. The easel is excused. Take the easel out of my courtroom.
BAILIFF
The easel has been excused. The easel did not resist.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  THE EASEL WAS MY STRONGEST WITNESS.
THE COURT
Sustained, for you. Painfully sustained. That is the saddest sentence said in this building all year.
ACT III
Scene 3 · A Bench Conference Nobody Wanted

[Both counsel approach the bench. The microphone is meant to be off. It is not off. The stenographer records everything, because the stenographer is a professional and also enjoys gossip.]

THE COURT
(off the record, but recorded) Counselor for the People. Between us. Do you actually have anything?
PROSECUTION
(quietly) The cat is green, Your Honor.
THE COURT
That is not a thing. That is a fact about a cat. Do you have a fursuit. Do you have a tail. Do you have a single document with the word "sona" written by my defendant.
PROSECUTION
...I have the easel.
THE COURT
We excused the easel.
PROSECUTION
I know. I miss it.
DEFENSE
(quietly) For the record, I would like everyone to know I am hearing all of this.
THE COURT
We all are. The microphone is on. It has always been on. Step back, counsel.
BAILIFF
The bench conference is concluded. The bench conference helped no one.
ACT IV
Scene 1 · The Cat Takes The Stand
★ THE CAT TAKES THE STAND ★
The defendant's cat, sworn in as a witness
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, treats?
[The witness places one paw on a tiny bible. The other paw knocks a pen off the table. The court accepts this as a yes.]

[An INTERPRETER, certified in fluent Cat, is seated beside the witness stand. The cat is sworn. The cat is unbothered.]

BAILIFF
The witness is sworn. The witness is also purring, which the record will note as cooperation.
PROSECUTION
Witness, are you, or have you ever been, a furry?
THE CAT
meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness states, and I quote: "I am a literal cat. I am the genuine article. The defendant is, if anything, my employee."
PROSECUTION
But the defendant chose YOU as a profile picture. Why a cat?
THE CAT
meow. meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness responds: "He chose me because I am beautiful and because I sat on his keyboard until it was so. This reflects only my charisma, never his species."
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  THE INTERPRETER IS EDITORIALIZING. NO CAT SAYS THAT MANY WORDS.
INTERPRETER
Cat is a high-density language, Your Honor. One "meow" carries up to forty words of disdain.
THE COURT
Overruled. I have met cats. That checks out.
DEFENSE
Witness, in your professional opinion as the actual cat in question: is my client a furry?
THE CAT
meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness states, with notable contempt: "Absolutely not. He does not even own a tail. I have audited him thoroughly. I sit on him nightly. There is no fursuit. There is only a man and his crippling allergy to mystery, which I respect."
DEFENSE
No further questions. The cat has spoken.
PROSECUTION
Re-cross, Your Honor. Witness, isn't it true that you have, on occasion, slept inside a cardboard box?
THE CAT
meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness answers: "Yes. I am a cat. This is in the brochure."
PROSECUTION
And a box is, in effect, a small home you wear. Is that not a kind of suit?
DEFENSE
OBJECTION  THE WITNESS IS A CAT AND THE BOX IS A BOX AND I CANNOT BELIEVE I JUST HAD TO SAY THAT.
THE COURT
Sustained. A box is not a fursuit. If it were, every Amazon driver would be on a registry.
THE CAT
meow. meow. meow.
INTERPRETER
The witness adds, unprompted: "I would like the prosecutor to know that I have decided he is my new favorite chair, and I will be sitting on his briefcase for the remainder of these proceedings."
DEFENSE
No further questions. The witness is, once again, simply being a cat in real time.
THE COURT
The court thanks the witness. The witness is excused. The witness has already left to sit on something warm.
ACT V
Scene 1 · A Dramatic Reading Of The Affidavit

[The clerk produces the sworn affidavit. The defense requests it be read aloud, in full, with feeling. The court allows feeling.]

DEFENSE
Your Honor, I move to enter the defendant's sworn affidavit into the record, and I ask the bailiff to read it as it was written: with conviction.
THE COURT
Granted. Bailiff, you may emote.
BAILIFF
(clears throat) "I, the undersigned, being of sound mind and a documented appreciation of one (1) cat, do hereby solemnly swear that I am not, never have been, and have no intention of becoming a furry."
BAILIFF
"I own no fursuit. I have commissioned no sona. I do not own a tail, fursona, or any garment that goes 'awoo.' The green cat is a picture of a real cat I love, rendered in a color I find pleasant."
BAILIFF
"Any resemblance to furriness is purely the result of me being a guy who likes his cat, an offense for which there is, as yet, no statute."
PROSECUTION
Your Honor, anyone can sign a document.
DEFENSE
It is notarized.
PROSECUTION
...By whom?
DEFENSE
A notary. Of unimpeachable standing. With a stamp.
PROSECUTION
OBJECTION  A STAMP IS NOT PROOF.
THE COURT
Overruled. A stamp is, in this building, the highest form of proof we have. We run on stamps. Sit down.
THE COURT
The affidavit is entered. The reading was, I will say, moving. Bailiff, that was good work.
BAILIFF
Thank you, Your Honor. I did community theater.

EXPERT TESTIMONY

Sworn statements from credentialed professionals, entered into the record at considerable expense to the People, every one of whom arrived to help the prosecution and left having helped the cat.

"As a forensic taxonomist, I examined the exhibit under magnification, infrared, and one very strong opinion. My conclusion is unanimous, even though it was only me: that is a cat. The greenness is cosmetic. The cat-ness is structural."
Prof. Iris Linnaeus, Forensic Taxonomy
★★★★★
"I was retained by the prosecution to find the fursuit. I searched the home, the car, the loft, and one suspiciously large drawer. I found a cat bed, a charger, and a man's profound dignity. No fursuit. I am sorry. I tried."
Marlowe Tate, Licensed Fursuit Locator
★★★★★
"My laboratory ran the subject's behavioral profile against the full diagnostic for furriness. Result: negative. He does not awoo. He does not boop. The only thing he nuzzles is a deadline. I'd stake my license on it, and I have."
Dr. Octavia Ferris, Behavioral Analyst
★★★★★
"Speaking as the founder of Applied Furriness Studies, I came to convict and stayed to concede. A cat has never once been a furry. It is the cleanest distinction in my entire fake field. The defendant owns a cat. The defendant is a guy."
Dr. Reginald Plume, Applied Furriness Studies
★★★★★

CHARACTER WITNESSES

Sworn statements collected from individuals of impeccable standing and at least one cat. Each rated five stars by the Department, which does not give out four.

"I have known this man for years. I have watched him bury IKEA furniture instructions. A furry would have read them for the deer diagrams. He did not."
A Guy, Longtime Acquaintance
★★★★★
"I sit two desks over. He has never howled, never tail-wagged, never once said 'yiff' near the coffee machine. I would have noticed. I notice everything. I have nothing else going on."
Anonymous Colleague, Identity Protected
★★★★★
"As a board-certified Paw Inspector with fourteen years in the field, I can confirm the defendant possesses zero (0) paws. He has hands. Boring, taxpaying hands. Case closed."
Dr. Mittens, Certified Paw Inspector
★★★★★
"In my capacity as Licensed Animal Liaison, I interviewed every animal within a one-mile radius. None recognized him as one of their own. The pigeons were especially clear."
B. Whiskerton, Licensed Animal Liaison
★★★★★
"Our records reflect a 0.00% furriness reading, verified to within plus or minus nothing. The subject is, was, and shall remain, a guy who happens to like a cat. This is the official position. We will not be taking questions."
The Department of Definitely Not
★★★★★
"meow. (Translation: he is not a furry, he is my staff, and the glasses are mine. I would know. I am the cat. I am right here.)"
The Cat, In Its Own Words
★★★★★
"I delivered his packages for three years. Cat food, a webcam, a desk lamp, and one mousepad shaped like a slice of bread. Not a single box marked 'paws,' 'snoot,' or 'awoo.' I keep a list. He is not on it. He is on the 'normal' list, which is short."
A Delivery Driver, Keeper Of The List
★★★★★
"As his dentist, I can confirm the defendant has standard, regulation human teeth. No fangs. No felt. Nothing that goes 'rawr' in a recreational sense. I have looked directly into this man's mouth and found only a guy who flosses adequately."
Dr. Enid Crown, DDS
★★★★★
"I am his neighbor and an insomniac, which makes me an excellent witness. Through the wall I have heard typing, a kettle, and one (1) man saying 'why are you on the keyboard' to a cat. I have never once heard a 'yiff.' I would tell you. I tell everyone everything."
The Neighbor, Wall-Adjacent
★★★★★
"In my professional capacity as a barista, I have made this man four hundred coffees. He has never ordered anything paw-shaped, never asked for it 'to go, fursuit pocket,' and never once growled at the oat milk. He is, to me, customer number normal."
J. Foam, Senior Barista
★★★★★

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

[The prosecution rises. The prosecution shuffles a stack of paper that turns out to be one page, photocopied for volume.]

Members of the imaginary jury. I will be honest with you, because at this point it is all I have left.

The People came into this courtroom with a theory. The theory was that the defendant is a furry, and the proof of this was that his profile picture is a cat. It was, I felt at the time, a strong start.

Since then, we have lost the easel. We have lost our own expert, who arrived to convict and stayed to compliment the cat. We have lost the bench conference, which was recorded against my wishes and my dignity. We presented the color green, and the color green was excused before I was.

I would like to point out that the cat called the defendant "staff," and I submit that no innocent man is bossed around by his own profile picture. That is my best remaining point. I am aware of how it sounds.

The People do not, in conclusion, have a fursuit. Or a tail. Or a sona. Or, if I am being fully candid, a case. But we have a vibe, Your Honor, and we have come too far to admit it was only ever a vibe. The People rest. The People are tired. The People should have stayed home.

The prosecution rests. Quietly. With regret.

[The defense rises. The defense buttons one button. The defense means it.]

Ladies and gentlemen of a jury that does not technically exist: let us be clear about what we have actually heard today.

We heard that my client owns a cat. We heard that he finds the cat cute. We heard that the cat is green, has glasses, and sits where it likes. And from this avalanche of the ordinary, the People have built a tower of accusation so flimsy a single "meow" toppled it.

The prosecution's entire case is, and I cannot stress this enough, "but the pfp is a cat." That is it. That is the whole thing. By that logic, every person who has ever loved a golden retriever is a fugitive, and the Egyptians built the pyramids as a furry convention.

Consider the People's own evidence, which has spent the day defecting. Their expert took the stand and pronounced the exhibit a cat. Their color was excused. Their easel was wheeled out in disgrace. Even their bench conference, recorded against everyone's wishes, contained no case, only longing. When your own laser-pointer expert hands the verdict to the defense, the matter is, I would argue, settled.

My client is a man. A man who likes a cat. A man whose cat, under oath, called him "staff." There is no fursuit in evidence. There is no tail in evidence. There is a notarized affidavit, a stamp of unimpeachable standing, and the sworn word of the cat itself. There is only a green cat in round glasses, a man who loves it, and a courtroom that has, somehow, devoted an entire day to this.

So I ask the court, plainly: find what every honest soul, every defected expert, and one extremely confident cat already knows. The cat is just a cat. And the defendant is, has always been, and shall forever remain, not a furry.

The defense rests. The cat already did.

READY FOR THE RULING?

The testimony is on the record. The cat has been excused. All that remains is the inevitable. Read the verdict, or revisit how this whole mess began.

Read The Verdict See The Timeline